Early voting is about to begin and there’s another amendment
that you need to take a long, hard look at before casting your ballot. That is Amendment 3. I urge you to vote “No” on this
amendment to our constitution that threatens the core of our judicial system.
This is how the Amendment will appear on your ballot:
Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended so as to abolish the
existing Judicial Qualifications Commission; require the General Assembly to
create and provide by general law for the composition, manner of appointment,
and governance of a new Judicial Qualifications Commission, with such
commission having the power to discipline, remove, and cause involuntary
retirement of judges; require the Judicial Qualifications Commission to have
procedures that provide for due process of law and review by the Supreme Court
of its advisory opinions; and allow the Judicial Qualifications Commission to
be open to the public in some manner?
So, why should you care about this seemingly innocuous
ballot measure?
This Amendment is a hostile attempt by the Georgia
Legislature to take over the one agency that protects our judicial system from
Judges who commit acts of criminal and moral turpitude. Plus, all the other
reasons a judge may become unfit to serve in a position that has such a great
impact on the lives of our citizens.
Let me tell you how Amendment 3 managed to end up on
our ballot. In 1972, the Judicial
Qualifications Commission (JQC) was created by another amendment to our
constitution. The JQC is an independent
“watchdog” group over all Judges in our state. Normal citizens going about
their daily lives have probably given little thought to who polices the judges
who judge us and who we depend on to have unbiased judgment.
The JQC, under-funded and under-staffed, has been quietly
going about their job protecting the integrity of our judicial system. The JCQ is currently made up of (1) Three
members of the State Bar of Georgia active for 10 years or more, who are
elected by the State Bar’s Board of Governors, (2) Two judges of any Court
selected by the Supreme Court, and (3) Two citizens, neither of whom are
members of the State Bar, who are appointed by the Governor. Over the years, the JQC has removed 77
Judges from the bench, only the worst of the worst judges. Judges are human and they make mistakes, but
those 77 Judges did not make simple mistakes.
The only person or person who would have a problem with this
Agency doing their job is a Judge, and one is former Judge Johnnie L. Caldwell,
Jr., not to be confused with his esteemed father that served Georgia well in
many positions over his lifetime.
In 2010, Caldwell, Superior Court Judge of the Griffin
Judicial District, resigned from the bench after the JQC had a “come to Jesus”
meeting with him regarding his sexually explicit harassment of a female
attorney. Court transcripts, which Judge
Caldwell went to great lengths to attempt to conceal, contained graphic details
of his shocking words and perversion.
In return for not being “removed,” Mr. Caldwell was allowed to resign to
“spend more time with his family.” In
a letter to the JQC, he accepted responsibility for his actions and vowed he
would never seek another judgeship.
Instead, he ran for, and was elected State Representative to the State
Legislature. Now he is a co-sponsor
of amendment 3, the very legislation that will abolish the JQC and turn it
over to the members of the State Legislature.
Judges would then be answerable only to members of the Georgia General
Assembly! How horrifying is that?
I see this Amendment as a crusade by a former Judge holding
a grudge and having a vendetta. As
evidence of this, Johnnie Caldwell did not recuse himself from the vote taken
by the legislature as another Judge did who was merely a candidate for Judge at
that time.
The fact that Johnnie Caldwell, Jr. is a sponsor of this
bill is reason enough to vote “No.” No
hearings were held prior to this amendment being placed on our ballot and the
public was not asked for input. The legislation itself offers little detail as
to how this new JQC would work. The last line of the ballot question says,
“…open to the public in some way?”
Wouldn’t you like to know exactly “what way” before voting on this
important measure? If this law is
passed, it puts the over-sight of all state judges into the hands of the
General Assembly. Then they are free to
tinker with the law each time a Judge and his network has a complaint.
Let me give you an example of a Governor and General
Assembly controlled commission. The
State Ethics Commission! This
commission tasked with transparency in government is one of the most political
commissions in Georgia. It’s a
joke! It has gone from being a “watch
dog” group to a Save-a-Pet.
The current JQC is not perfect, but it is as close to being
non-political as anything we’ve got. We
need to keep it that way. My only
advice comes from my years as a paralegal serving in courtrooms and it’s something
I have been yearning to tell the JQC for years. The current JQC has used very
high standards to remove unfit judges from the bench. Evidently, a Judge with advanced dementia does not qualify for
removal under the current standards.